HMO
In the United States, a health maintenance organization (HMO) is a medical insurance group that provides health services for a fixed annual fee.[1] It is an organization that provides or arranges managed care for health insurance, self-funded health care benefit plans, individuals, and other entities, acting as a liaison with health care providers (hospitals, doctors, etc.) on a prepaid basis. The US Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973 required employers with 25 or more employees to offer federally certified HMO options if the employer offers traditional healthcare options.[2] Unlike traditional indemnity insurance, an HMO covers care rendered by those doctors and other professionals who have agreed by contract to treat patients in accordance with the HMO’s guidelines and restrictions in exchange for a steady stream of customers. HMOs cover emergency care regardless of the health care provider’s contracted status.
Operation
HMOs often require members to select a primary care physician (PCP), a doctor who acts as a gatekeeper to direct access to medical services but this is not always the case. PCPs are usually internists, pediatricians, family doctors, geriatricians, or general practitioners (GPs). Except in medical emergency situations, patients need a referral from the PCP in order to see a specialist or other doctor, and the gatekeeper cannot authorize that referral unless the HMO guidelines deem it necessary. Some HMOs pay gatekeeper PCPs set fees for each defined medical procedure they provide to insured patients (fee-for-service) and then capitate specialists (that is, pay a set fee for each insured person’s care, irrespective of which medical procedures the specialists performs to achieve that care), while others use the reverse arrangement.
Open-access and point-of-service (POS) products are a combination of an HMO and traditional indemnity plan. The member(s) are not required to use a gatekeeper or obtain a referral before seeing a specialist. In that case, the traditional benefits are applicable. If the member uses a gatekeeper, the HMO benefits are applied. However, the beneficiary cost sharing (e.g., co-payment or coinsurance) may be higher for specialist care.[3] HMOs also manage care through utilization review. That means they monitor doctors to see if they are performing more services for their patients than other doctors, or fewer. HMOs often provide preventive care for a lower copayment or for free, in order to keep members from developing a preventable condition that would require a great deal of medical services. When HMOs were coming into existence, indemnity plans often did not cover preventive services, such as immunizations, well-baby checkups, mammograms, or physicals. It is this inclusion of services intended to maintain a member’s health that gave the HMO its name. Some services, such as outpatient mental health care, are limited, and more costly forms of care, diagnosis, or treatment may not be covered. Experimental treatments and elective services that are not medically necessary (such as elective plastic surgery) are almost never covered.
Other choices for managing care are case management, in which patients with catastrophic cases are identified, or disease management, in which patients with certain chronic diseases like diabetes, asthma, or some forms of cancer are identified. In either case, the HMO takes a greater level of involvement in the patient’s care, assigning a case manager to the patient or a group of patients to ensure that no two providers provide overlapping care, and to ensure that the patient is receiving appropriate treatment, so that the condition does not worsen beyond what can be helped.
Cost containment
Although businesses pursued the HMO model for its alleged cost containment benefits, some research indicates that private HMO plans do not achieve any significant cost savings over non-HMO plans. Although out-of-pocket costs are reduced for consumers, controlling for other factors, the plans do not affect total expenditures and payments by insurers. A possible reason for this failure is that consumers might increase utilization in response to less cost sharing under HMOs.[4] Some[5] have asserted that HMOs (especially those run for profit) actually increase administrative costs and tend to cherry-pick healthier patients.
History
Though some forms of group “managed care” did exist prior to the 1970s, in the US they came about chiefly through the influence of President Richard Nixon and his friend Edgar Kaiser. In discussion in the White House on February 17, 1971, Nixon expressed his support for the essential philosophy of the HMO, which John Ehrlichman explained thus: “All the incentives are toward less medical care, because the less care they give them, the more money they make.”[6]
The earliest form of HMOs can be seen in a number of “prepaid health plans”. In 1910, the Western Clinic in Tacoma, Washington offered lumber mill owners and their employees certain medical services from its providers for a premium of $0.50 per member per month. This is considered by some to be the first example of an HMO. However, Ross-Loos Medical Group, established in 1929, is considered to be the first HMO in the United States; it was headquartered in Los Angeles and initially provided services for Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (DWP) and Los Angeles County employees. 200 DWP employees enrolled at a cost of $1.50 each per month. Within a year, the Los Angeles Fire Department signed up, then the Los Angeles Police Department, then the Southern California Telephone Company (now AT&T Inc.), and more. By 1951, enrollment stood at 35,000 and included teachers, county and city employees. In 1982 through the merger of the Insurance Company of North America (INA) founded in 1792 and Connecticut General (CG) founded in 1865 came together to become CIGNA. Also in 1929 Dr. Michael Shadid created a health plan in Elk City, Oklahoma in which farmers bought shares for $50 to raise the money to build a hospital. The medical community did not like this arrangement and threatened to suspend Shadid’s licence. The Farmer’s Union took control of the hospital and the health plan in 1934. Also in 1929, Baylor Hospital provided approximately 1,500 teachers with prepaid care. This was the origin of Blue Cross. Around 1939, state medical societies created Blue Shield plans to cover physician services, as Blue Cross covered only hospital services. These prepaid plans burgeoned during the Great Depression as a method for providers to ensure constant and steady revenue.
In 1970, the number of HMOs declined to fewer than 40. Paul M. Ellwood Jr., often called the “father” of the HMO, began having discussions with what is today the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that led to the enactment of the Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973. This act had three main provisions:
- Grants and loans were provided to plan, start, or expand an HMO
- Certain state-imposed restrictions on HMOs were removed if the HMOs were federally certified
- Employers with 25 or more employees were required to offer federally certified HMO options alongside indemnity upon request
This last provision, called the dual choice provision, was the most important, as it gave HMOs access to the critical employer-based market that had often been blocked in the past. The federal government was slow to issue regulations and certify plans until 1977, when HMOs began to grow rapidly. The dual choice provision expired in 1995.
In 1971, Gordon K. MacLeod developed and became the director of the United States’ first federal HMO program. He was recruited by Elliot Richardson, the secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Types
HMOs operate in a variety of forms. Most HMOs today do not fit neatly into one form; they can have multiple divisions, each operating under a different model, or blend two or more models together. In the staff model, physicians are salaried and have offices in HMO buildings. In this case, physicians are direct employees of the HMOs. This model is an example of a closed-panel HMO, meaning that contracted physicians may only see HMO patients. Previously this type of HMO was common, although currently it is nearly inactive.[7] In the group model, the HMO does not employ the physicians directly, but contracts with a multi-specialty physician group practice. Individual physicians are employed by the group practice, rather than by the HMO. The group practice may be established by the HMO and only serve HMO members (“captive group model”). Kaiser Permanente is an example of a captive group model HMO rather than a staff model HMO, as is commonly believed. An HMO may also contract with an existing, independent group practice (“independent group model”), which will generally continue to treat non-HMO patients. Group model HMOs are also considered closed-panel, because doctors must be part of the group practice to participate in the HMO – the HMO panel is closed to other physicians in the community.[8]
If not already part of a group medical practice, physicians may contract with an independent practice association (IPA), which in turn contracts with the HMO. This model is an example of an open-panel HMO, where a physician may maintain their own office and may see non-HMO members.
In the network model, an HMO will contract with any combination of groups, IPAs (Independent Practice Associations), and individual physicians. Since 1990, most HMOs run by managed care organizations with other lines of business (such as PPO, POS and indemnity) use the network model.
Regulation
HMOs in the United States are regulated at both the state and federal levels. They are licensed by the states, under a license that is known as a certificate of authority (COA) rather than under an insurance license.[9] State and federal regulators also issue mandates, requirements for health maintenance organizations to provide particular products. In 1972 the National Association of Insurance Commissioners adopted the HMO Model Act, which was intended to provide a model regulatory structure for states to use in authorizing the establishment of HMOs and in monitoring their operation.[10]
Legal responsibilities
HMOs often have a negative public image due to their restrictive appearance. HMOs have been the target of lawsuits claiming that the restrictions of the HMO prevented necessary care. Whether an HMO can be held responsible for a physician’s negligence partially depends on the HMO’s screening process.[citation needed] If an HMO only contracts with providers meeting certain quality criteria and advertises this to its members, a court may be more likely to find that the HMO is responsible, just as hospitals can be liable for negligence in selecting physicians. However, an HMO is often insulated from malpractice lawsuits. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) can be held to preempt negligence claims as well. In this case, the deciding factor is whether the harm results from the plan’s administration or the provider’s actions. ERISA does not preempt or insulate HMOs from breach of contract or state law claims asserted by an independent, third-party provider of medical services.[11]
See also
- Capitated reimbursement
- Exclusive provider network
- Preferred provider organization
- Publicly funded health care
- Sicko, a Michael Moore documentary criticizing HMOs
- Single-payer health care
References
- ^ “BBC News – G-I – Health Maintenance Organization / HMO”. news.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2018.
- ^ Joseph L. Dorsey, “The Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-222) and Prepaid Group Practice Plan,” Medical Care, Vol. 13, No. 1, (Jan., 1975), pp. 1–9
- ^ Kongstvedt, Peter R. (2001). The Managed Health Care Handbook (Fourth ed.). Aspen Publishers. p. 40. ISBN 0-8342-1726-0.
- ^ Jaeun Shin, Sangho Moon, “Do HMO Plans Reduce Expenditure in the Private Sector?”, Economic Inquiry, Jan 2007.
- ^ “Claim That HMO’s Save Money Is Little More Than “Folklore” Health Affairs Study Finds,” 2000. Physicians for a National Health Program.
- ^ Nixon, Richard. “Transcript of taped conversation between President Richard Nixon and John D. Ehrlichman (1971) that led to the HMO act of 1973”. Wikisource. Retrieved 7 April 2018.
- ^ “Staff-Model HMOs: Don’t Blink or You’ll Miss Them!”. managedcaremag.com. 1 July 1999. Retrieved 22 March 2018.
- ^ Peter R. Kongstvedt, “The Managed Health Care Handbook,” 4th edition, Aspen Publishers, Inc., 2001, ISBN 0-8342-1726-0, pp. 35–26
- ^ Peter R. Kongstvedt, “The Managed Health Care Handbook,” Fourth Edition, Aspen Publishers, Inc., 2001, p. 1322 ISBN 0-8342-1726-0
- ^ O’Rourke, Paul F. (1974). Organizational aspects of prepaid health plans-HMO’s. California.
- ^ Baylor University Medical Center v. Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. No. Civ.A. 3:03-CV-2084-G. Jan. 9, 2004. Memorandum Order
External links
EPO
In the United States, an exclusive provider organization (EPO) is a hybrid health insurance plan in which a primary care provider is not necessary, but health care providers must be seen within a predetermined network. Out-of-network care is not provided, and visits require pre-authorization. Doctors are paid as a function of care provided, as opposed to a health maintenance organization (HMO). Also, the payment scheme is usually fee for service, in contrast to HMOs in which the healthcare provider is paid by capitation and receives a monthly fee, regardless of whether the patient is seen.[1]
History
Exclusive provider plans existed as early as 1983 as a variation of preferred provider plans, which emerged in the early 1980s.[2]
See also
References
- ^ Davis, Elizabeth. “EPO Health Insurance—How It Compares to HMOs and PPOs”. HealthInsurance.About.com. Archived from the original on March 7, 2014. Retrieved Jan 15, 2014.
- ^ Katz, Cheryl (June 1983). “Preferred Provider Organizations”. Postgraduate Medicine. 73 (6): 143–146. doi:10.1080/00325481.1983.11697868. ISSN 0032-5481.
PPO
In U.S. health insurance, a preferred provider organization (PPO), sometimes referred to as a participating provider organization or preferred provider option, is a managed care organization of medical doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers who have agreed with an insurer or a third-party administrator to provide health care at reduced rates to the insurer’s or administrator’s clients.
Overview
A preferred provider organization is a subscription-based medical care arrangement.[1] A membership allows a substantial discount below the regularly charged rates of the designated professionals partnered with the organization. Preferred provider organizations themselves earn money by charging an access fee to the insurance company for the use of their network, unlike the usual insurance with premiums and corresponding payments paid either in full or partially by the insurance provider to the medical doctor. They negotiate with providers to set fee schedules and handle disputes between insurers and providers. PPOs can also contract with one another to strengthen their position in certain geographic areas without forming new relationships directly with providers. This will be mutually beneficial in theory as the PPO will be billed at the reduced rate when its insureds utilize the services of the “preferred” provider, and the provider will see an increase in its business as almost all insureds in the organization will only use providers who are members. PPOs have gained popularity because, although they tend to have slightly higher premiums than HMOs and other more restrictive plans, they offer patients more flexibility overall.[2]
History
In 1980, an early PPO was organized in Denver at St. Luke’s Medical Center at the suggestion of Samuel Jenkins,[3] an employee of the Segal Group who consulted with hospitals for Taft-Hartley trust funds.[4]: 6 By 1982, 40 plans were counted and by 1983 variations such as the exclusive provider organization had arisen.[3] In the 1980s, PPOs spread in cities in the Western United States, particularly California due to favorable state laws.[3]
PPO
Other features of a preferred provider organization generally include utilization review, where representatives of the insurer or administrator review the records of treatments provided to verify that they are appropriate for the condition being treated rather being largely, or solely, being performed to increase the number of people due. Another near-universal feature is a pre-certification requirement, in which scheduled (non-emergency) hospital admissions, and in some instances, outpatient surgery, must have the prior approval of the insurer and must often undergo “utilization review” in advance.[5]
Comparison to exclusive provider organization (EPO)
A PPO is similar to an exclusive provider organization (EPO) in structure, administration, and operation. Unlike EPO members, however, PPO members are reimbursed for using medical care providers outside of their network of designated doctors and hospitals. However, when they use out-of-network providers PPO members are reimbursed at a reduced rate that may include higher deductibles and co-payments, lower reimbursement percentages, or a combination of these financial penalties. EPO members, on the other hand, receive no reimbursement or benefit if they visit medical care providers outside of their designated network of doctors and hospitals. EPOs do allow reimbursement outside of the network in emergency cases, per the Affordable Care Act.[6]
Comparison to health maintenance organization (HMO)
A PPO is similar to a health maintenance organization (HMO) in structure, administration, and operation. Unlike PPOs, however, HMOs often require members to select a primary care physician (PCP), a doctor who acts as a gatekeeper to direct access to non-emergency medical services, and are required to first obtain a referral from their PCP in order to be reimbursed for the cost of medical services inside of their network of designated doctors and hospitals. HMO plans generally have lower cost and lower monthly premiums than PPO plans and HMO members can usually expect to pay less out of pocket to cover medical costs than PPO members.[7]
See also
- Dental plan
- Health maintenance organization
- Independent practice association
- Point of service plan
- Silent PPO
- Single-payer health care
References
- ^ Ellwein, Linda Krane (15 June 1982). An Introduction to: Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs). InterStudy. OL 14736792M.
- ^ “Health Harbor – Health Insurance Plan Choices”. Archived from the original on 2011-01-11. Retrieved 2011-01-27.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Katz, Cheryl (June 1983). “Preferred provider organizations”. Postgraduate Medicine. 73 (6): 143–146. doi:10.1080/00325481.1983.11697868. ISSN 0032-5481. PMID 6856523.
- ^ Kongstvedt, Peter (2009-10-07). Managed Care: What It Is and How It Works. Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN 9780763759117.
- ^ Haas, Marjorie Segel (1991). Preferred Provider Organization. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Relations and Cooperative Programs.
- ^ “Getting Emergency Care”. Healthcare.gov. Retrieved 2020-01-19.
- ^ “HMO vs. PPO: Which is right for you?”. Humana, Inc.
External links
POS
A point of service plan is a type of managed care health insurance plan in the United States. It combines characteristics of the health maintenance organization (HMO) and the preferred provider organization (PPO).[1]
The POS is based on a managed care foundation—lower medical costs in exchange for more limited choice. But POS health insurance does differ from other managed care plans.
Enrollees in a POS plan are required to choose a primary care physician (PCP) from within the health care network; this PCP becomes their “point of service”. The PCP may make referrals outside the network, but with lesser compensation offered by the patient’s health insurance company. For medical visits within the health care network, paperwork is usually completed for the patient. If the patient chooses to go outside the network, it is the patient’s responsibility to fill out forms, send bills in for payment, and keep an accurate account of health care receipts.
References
- ^ United States; Prospective Payment Assessment Commission (1991). “Medicare and the American health care system: a report to the Congress”. Medicare and the American Health Care System: A Report to the Congress: 99. OCLC 24097034.
- Glossary, Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (URL updated September 7, 2009).
- Definitions of Health Insurance Terms, U.S. Interdepartmental Committee on Employment-based Health Insurance Surveys (URL retrieved September 30, 2006).
- Sankey, Judith A., “Employee Benefit Plans: A Glossary of Terms“, International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, 1997, ISBN 0-89154-513-1.